plan-ceo-review (gstack)

Reviews an already-written plan from a founder's chair — is the scope right, are the priorities ordered well, is this the most valuable thing to build now. It judges a finished plan on business and product grounds, where an engineering review would judge that same plan on architecture, and idea pressure-testing would question the concept before any plan exists.

A situation it fits

Your founding team finished a multi-page go-to-market and product roadmap and asks for a high-level review: are we building the right thing next quarter?
plan-ceo-review (gstack). plan-ceo-review is the right choice when a concrete plan already exists and you need a business- and product-focused critique of scope and sequencing. It evaluates whether the stated priorities and scope make sense now. The other skills either work earlier (idea interrogation), later (post-mortem), or focus on turning concepts into implementation details.

3 scenarios in the bank answer to plan-ceo-review (gstack). The rest are in the game.

Skills it gets confused with

These share a family with plan-ceo-review (gstack), which is another way of saying they are the ones you might reach for by mistake.

Knowing what plan-ceo-review (gstack) does is the easy half. Telling it apart from the others under time pressure is the game.

Today's session

plan-ceo-review (gstack) is part of garrytan/gstack. Licence: MIT. The description above was written for this game, not taken from the skill.

← All skills